Attorney John Helms a leading Dallas drug crime defense lawyer shares common defenses against drug possession charges, including challenging the legality of the search and seizure.
Dallas, TX –News Direct– Prodigy Press Wire
Drug possession charges can result in severe jail time, but drug arrest lawyers have a variety of common defenses to defend their clients. These defenses include claiming an illegal search and seizure, proving that the confiscated narcotics were not restricted substances, or claiming that the evidence was planted, especially in communities where police have a history of wrongdoing.
It is critical to consult your case with a top drug crime lawyer in Dallas with the requisite experience, connections, and track record to fight these charges and protect defendants’ legal rights properly. John M Helms, a former federal prosecutor and drug crime lawyer, is well-versed in navigating the complexity of controlled substance accusations.
One typical defense to drug possession charges is to question the constitutionality of law enforcement’s search and seizure. Any narcotics uncovered during the search may be considered inadmissible as evidence if the search violates due process, such as entering a residence without a warrant or consent.
Another defense technique is to claim that the seized substances were not, in fact, controlled substances. This may entail proving that the chemicals in question were innocuous or non-illegal, such as baking soda mistaken for cocaine.
When police wrongdoing is common, the defense may claim the evidence was planted. This defense is solid when backed up by eyewitness testimony and previous incidents of corruption involving the arresting officer or federal agent.
Given the significant number of people arrested for felony drug possession with little drugs, it is critical to seek the advice of an experienced Dallas drug crime lawyer who understands the complexities of these cases and can vigorously defend the defendant.
Read more at