Paper: “Not a SAFE Bet: Equitable Access to Cannabis Banking, An Analysis of the SAFE Banking Act.”

CRCC’s paper, published by the Ohio State University (OSU) Moritz College of Law, is titled “Not a SAFE Bet: Equitable Access to Cannabis Banking, An Analysis of the SAFE Banking Act.”

Ohio State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 721, 2022

Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, August, 2022

21 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2022

Cat Packer

Distinguished Cannabis Policy Practitioner in Residence, Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University

Shaleen Title

Distinguished Cannabis Policy Practitioner in Residence, Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University

Rafi Aliya Crockett

Commissioner, Washington, D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and Treasurer, Cannabis Regulators of Color Coalition

Dasheeda Dawson

Cannabis Program Manager, City of Portland, Oregon; Chair, Cannabis Regulators of Color Coalition; and Adjunct Professor, LIM College

Date Written: August 11, 2022

Abstract

According to its sponsors and supporters, the Safe and Fair Enforcement (‘SAFE’) Banking Act would help address the challenges faced by small cannabis businesses that cannot currently access banking services or loans. With cannabis social equity programs ramping up across the nation but their participants lacking capital, a bill to solve that problem would be a well-timed blessing. But unfortunately, SAFE, as written, is unlikely to result in equitable access to financial services.

This paper summarizes the bill, analyzes why it would fall short of its purported goals, and makes recommendations to improve the bill. Here are our ten recommended amendments in short form, recognizing that none are an adequate solution on its own:

Use revenue collected by 280E to create a fund providing capital for businesses owned by people harmed by the War on Drugs. As a condition of safe harbor, require financial institutions to demonstrate compliance with anti-discrimination laws such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Explicitly protect Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). Raise evidentiary requirements and limit enforcement penalties for MDIs and CDFIs for servicing legitimate cannabis businesses. Expand required federal guidance and reports to promote equity alongside diversity and inclusion. Require federal banking regulators to identify best practices to achieve racial equity in financial services. Clarify that cannabis criminal records are not an automatic red flag. Identify barriers beyond marketplace entry by including barriers experienced before, during, and after the licensure process. Study and report on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the hemp industry, as well as the cannabis industry. Promote compliance with state and local regulatory requirements regarding business ownership.

 

Keywords: SAFE Banking, Safe and Fair Enforcement Banking Act, cannabis industry, marijuana reform, cannabis banking, social equity, cannabis regulation

Packer, Cat and Title, Shaleen and Crockett, Rafi Aliya and Dawson, Dasheeda, Not a SAFE Bet: Equitable Access to Cannabis Banking, An Analysis of the SAFE Banking Act (August 11, 2022). Ohio State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 721, 2022, Drug Enforcement and Policy Center, August, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4188072 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4188072

Primary Sponsor

Top Marijuana Blog